ENG-101 Week 2 Discussion 2 Name Institution Instructor Course Date ENG-101 Week 2 Discussion 2 Evaluation of the Sources In researching on the topic

ENG-101 Week 2 Discussion 2
Name
Institution
Instructor
Course
Date
ENG-101 Week 2 Discussion 2
Evaluation of the Sources
In researching on the topic, “Why having a live Christmas tree is better than an artificial tree,” I had to find sources of information to help me in analyzing the topic (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). One of the ways to find sources was to look for peer-reviewed sources, which include information supported by evidence (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). In finding my sources, I had to access the library where there was a wide variety of sources. The library has an advantage of providing different articles addressing the same topic, which helped me in collecting adequate information (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). The articles identified in the library had also other secondary sources listed in the articles, which were also useful in providing information about the topic (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013).
There are different ways, which I used to determine the credibility of the sources, which include looking for sources, which provided an in-depth analysis of the topic, which I was researching (Stebbins, 2015). In-depth information includes more information on the research topic as well as a reference list. The second step included identifying the purpose of the source where I focused on identifying sources made for academic and research purposes (Stebbins, 2015). This also included identifying the authors of the articles and any other work they might have done on similar topics. There are types of sources one should avoid when writing a research paper which include Wikipedia, which does not provide in-depth information on a certain topic (Stebbins, 2015).
Wikipedia is made to provide general knowledge on a given topic. The authors may not be credible, as they may not have specialized on the given topic (Bruno, 2014). Information in Wikipedia may be modified by anyone affecting its reliability. Blogs are also sources of information one should avoid when writing a research paper because anyone can post a blog on the internet (Bruno, 2014). There are also no implemented measures to verify if information given through blogs is credible. Unknown authors who may not have specialized on the given topic may also write blogs affecting its reliability in providing accurate information (Bruno, 2014).

References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. London: SAGE.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Bruno, L. (2014). From Research to I-Search. Cork: BookBaby.

Stebbins, L. F. (2015). Finding reliable information online: Adventures of an information sleuth. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing group.

x

Hi!
I'm Mila

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out